
Persistent fatigue, hair loss, digestive discomfort, or difficulty concentrating are non-specific symptoms that can have many origins. Sometimes, behind them there may be an imbalance in essential minerals (such as magnesium, zinc, or selenium) or exposure to toxic metals (such as mercury, lead, or arsenic) that goes unnoticed in a conventional analysis.
The use of these types of studies to better understand the origin of certain symptoms is becoming increasingly common. The most frequently asked question is always the same: which biological sample is the most appropriate? But there is no single answer. Blood, urine, stool, hair, nails, and saliva provide distinct and complementary information, as summarized in the following table.
| Sample | What it mainly reflects | Approximate time window |
|---|---|---|
| Blood | Recent exposure and current nutritional status | Days – weeks |
| Urine | Active renal excretion | Hours – days |
| Stool | Elimination via the digestive tract | Last few days |
| Hair | Medium-to-long-term accumulation | Months (≈1 cm = 1 month) |
| Nails | Long-term accumulation | Several months |
| Saliva | Local or oral exposure | Recent |
is the most common and standardized sample, requiring venous extraction. It provides information on recent exposure andis the most suitable option when you want to know the current nutritional status of minerals or assess recent toxic exposure.
Urine
reflects what the body is eliminating at that moment, making it especially useful for metals excreted renally, such as arsenic. A 24-hour collection offers a more complete view.
Stool
assesses the fraction the body eliminates via the digestive tract. It is useful for understanding recent exposure through ingestion and is often integrated into broader intestinal health studies, although its results can vary depending on transit time and diet in the preceding days.
Hair and nails
are the samples with the greatest capacity to reflect a history of medium-to-long-term exposure. Hair grows approximately 1 cm per month and nails about 3 mm, so both offer a useful historical perspective for metals that tend to deposit in the body, such as mercury. These are non-invasive and easy-to-collect samples, although they can be affected by external contamination: dyes, polishes, or work products.
Saliva
primarily reflects the oral microenvironment. It is a non-invasive and easy-to-collect sample, useful for assessing local exposures related to amalgam fillings, prostheses, or dental implants, and for studying elements like mercury or titanium in the oral context.
The choice of sample depends on the clinical question to be answered: whether recent exposure or long-term accumulation is of interest, a nutritional deficiency or intoxication, and the particular situation of each person.
Therefore, in many cases, more than one sample is combined to obtain a more complete picture. An out-of-range result, in any case, is always evaluated together with the clinical history and symptoms of each person.
If you have doubts about which sample is most appropriate for your clinical case, discuss it with your healthcare professional. If you are a professional and want more information about our metal and mineral studies, please write to consultas@teletest.es
BUDGETS
ACCESS TO YOUR TESTS
MY RESULTS
PROFESSIONAL ACCESS



